Branch 2: The Meaning of Life and Sexual Identities

Bruceisagoodboy: What do I do with all this information? I have never instinctively seen so much truth in one place before. But it makes me sad. And hopeful. And confused. Blessed be.

Reptiliandude: I know that this is going to seem at first to be a ridiculous answer to your question.But if you examine this video in its entirety, and with an open mind, you will discover a significant missing piece to the puzzle that is the meaning of life.

Bruceisagoodboy: Thank you. For more than I probably understand at this point. (Edit: that was the last thing I expected but exactly what I needed. I think I get it. Thanks again.)
Shyeejanut: “That’s why I’m here. Probably saved at least a thousand years of stumbling for my kind just learning your lingo.”

Bruceisagoodboy: Lol. Is a sense of humor universal?

Reptiliandude: As is the lack of it among most females of various species.

[deleted]: comment deleted by user

Reptiliandude: Facts remain.

Males and females are different.

They are different biologically and in the way in which they process information. Lactating breasts, menstruation, menopause… the list goes on.

These things are not social constructs.

These things play a key role in the identification of one’s relationship to self, so social engineers try and convince that individual that self is an illusion.

Anyone who points this salient fact out must by virtue of this dogma be labeled as a heretic or a “sexist.”

Transgenderism is a form of ‘coping device.’

A transgender will never agonize over an abortion, have a period, go through menopause, or think like a woman from birth.

Anyone who points this salient fact out must by virtue of the same argument be labeled as guilty of homophobia.

What you are seeing is a methodology to incite the ignorant mob on auto-cue.

Individuals thus knowing nothing about the individual concerned who seeks only to enlighten must be attacked so that the authority of those in charge of the ‘group think’ can remain in control of the narrative.

Those who oppose must be silenced and brow-beaten into admitting guilt and culpability for the societal problems of the word.

They are the new sinners.

They are the new heretics.

It is nothing more than a means of inciting the mob to witch hunt via another name.

It is only a means to control the thinking and the narrative so that rational discourse cannot take place.

Lelekfalo: A pity, because we are now no longer encouraged to honor these differences. Instead, we are called sexist for even pointing out the existence of said differences.

ACuriousHumanBeing: So I take those who transition their genders are fools then? What causes one to have such a coping mechanism? (Edit: To clarify: these messages were not made in anger, but as a means for further clarification. I shouldn’t have used fool. That was harsh of me, and something like misguided would’ve sufficed, or that may’ve even been chopped together. Thank you for your continued patience.)

Reptiliandude: I didn’t imply that they were fools. I said that it was a coping mechanism.

Let’s not make this thread about the dynamics of human sexuality. We can open up one on Insurrection.

The reason that I mentioned the transgender issue is that it leads to people mischaracterizing the poster and jumping to conclusions when issues involving facts rather than feelings are brought to the forefront.

This is part and parcel with how critical thinking is being discouraged in favor of emotionalism and compassion summoned to provide comfort to thin air.

Explorer1357: You might as well make one on insurrectionearth.

ACuriousHumanBeing: So in turn, because emotions is used instead of reason, is that why I see people sometimes have a problem with it. Its not so much the meal they’re eating. They would’ve liked it, but instead we served some crappy version of it, and people hate it. It’s a waste of compassion, or misdirection.
[deleted]: comment deleted by user

Reptiliandude: I watched the Great Khan cut across this world like a sickle.

During that time, he sexually assaulted more women than any other man in human history.

Yet, despite this close and intimate proximity—they could not, and many would not kill him. I require no schooling on what women can do, what they can learn and what they can achieve.

I am only stating that there are differences, and that these differences are real, and permanent.

A she-bear will fight for her cubs in exchange of her very life when they are threatened, but a feminized man in prison encountering the same threat to his own life shall drop to his knees and offer his open mouth.

Do not presume to lecture me on the nature of humankind or the narrative that has been played before me.

I have lived for thousands of your years before abandoning my flesh for this sackcloth which I now indignantly bear.

[deleted]: comment deleted by user

Reptiliandude: Do not be deceived. Our appearance of ancient age can, for the most part, be explained through an understanding of the concepts embodied in how we travel through the mouths of stars. Time thus, appears much differently between us and you. That is not to say that we aren’t long-lived. It is to declare before you that we are not gods.

ACuriousHumanBeing: Hold it now. If appearance is based on how one perceives time, based on the particular calibration of that time, then what do you see? Do we seem young to you since you seem old to us?

Lunar_Lander1: A woman even military trained is still a woman and I don’t state about how this good or bad, or even is they are good/better soldier. As you said some of the best spies were women and it’s precisely because ther were woman which made them better spies. Woman had certain charms (not even talking about sexual attirance from man to woman), certain abilities to think (not like the often dumb man who process mostly one though at a time) , etc. It’s because of those very biological differences who made woman spies better to spie on men. Do you think man has the same maternity toward babies ? It is the evidence to see the different and complementary leaning between woman and man. There is no absolute role but natural & biological tendancies/nature.

[deleted]: comment deleted by user

Lunar_Lander1: “tendencies/nature dictate every single thing for every situation” Nobody here said so. All is possible, each rule has its exception, etc… But the fact remains: there are some natural/biological differences between man and woman (and they are valuable as so).

ACuriousHumanBeing: It seems like a costly coping device, why are people trans then? (Edit: To clarify: these messages were not made in anger, but as a means for further clarification.)

Reptiliandude: They’re not happy with who they are.