Reptiliandude: The problem with using oil as a commodity is that it is tied into men who have historically shown that they have no loyalty except to themselves.

I’m not talking about the men who run the companies that extract and process it.

I’m referring to those men who have tied it into an exclusive means of exchange in order to hide their own business incompetence.

Lawyers make for shitty businessmen.

For the most part, when a lawyer involves themselves with anything but a law firm, they strangle innovation.

Their ideas about productivity stem from protecting themselves from lawsuits from other like-minded assholes like themselves.

So, they immediately set forth the task of increasing the amount of paperwork and require signatures on everything.

Ideas are turned inwards into self accusations and self incriminations so that all their new endeavors can be blamed on someone else should things go fubar.

They carry forth these horribly bad management characteristics into government.

When they discover that few things they now do are ever held to public scrutiny in this new environment, what little skills they brought to the table are now spent guaranteeing a place at the pig trough and preparing for their next election campaign.

Any and all who would shake up this parasitical relationship with the electorate are soon gas lighted or branded with whatever public fear or prejudice is popular at the time.

It is not a form of governance which lends itself to technological and cultural progress.

When Nixon encouraged the Saudis to exclusively use the dollar as the means of exchange for oil product, he created a false sense of security which only encouraged those with poor accounting skills to run for public office.

Not only has fiscal responsibility been cast to the winds, but in order to retain control of an economy which lawyers are ignorant and unskilled to manage, they must now sew seeds of discord with the one hand, while with the other pimping off the national sovereignty to fictitious global business entities and to closed-minded and tribal people crippled by the influences of primitives clinging to religious orthodoxies.

At this point, leadership becomes a popularity contest rather than an exercise in what is actually required.

In the West, those who seek to drive the public into debt have discovered that it is materialism and cupidity that makes for the most profit, so the more fiscally responsible masculine element, as well as the more prudent and cautious feminine elements are mischaracterized as redundant so they can be swept aside to make way for feminized males and capricious females who are known risk takers and incapable of making difficult decisions and valued judgments.

To complicate matters further, the herd mentality has taken over at this point and embraced what was nothing more than a way to promote wealth for money-lenders into a farcical belief system which has now taken on the characteristics of a religious orthodoxy.

In the West, those who have abandoned religious orthodoxy and traditional roles have now gone full swing and have committed themselves to a comical form of social engineering whereby the masculine element has been castigated and the worst and most vapid part of the feminine element celebrated as high culture—thus making way for a pushback from the very elements they’ve gas-lighted for decades.

Currently, there is little leadership with the required fortitude to change this self-destructive tide and to keep the west from falling straight over the precipice it was driven to by its own self-centered delusions.

The Consortium has determined that ‘democracy’ in its current form in the West has been a failure as it lacks the resolve to be vigilant and to keep it honest and resilient.

Humans are lazy and incapable of ruling themselves without descending into the corruption of product.

Now, even among those whose views of humanity are only the concerns for the continued and unrestricted flow of genetic resources from this world have raised their concerns about the instability this has caused to our own investment market.

Currently, it is not a war, but once again it is a new mutation of sexually transmitted disease that has been prepared to be unleashed upon the human element.

Well, it’s new to your society anyways…

The argument from my species is that such a disease could very well destroy European culture, leaving only Islamic influences relatively unscathed.

This is not a people known for their innovations, which is why we encouraged the destruction of the Ottoman Empire in the first place.

All eyes are focused upon a revitalized Russia and China, with the United States withdrawing from global affairs to deal with social upheavals at home.

It is for the cause of protecting humanity as a whole from the release of yet another contagion that you are seeing more asteroid activity in your skies.

I had hoped that a reasonable impact would awaken all concerned and would bring stability by encouraging nations to pool their resources and refocus their activities.

It is our final attempt to save the work of centuries of western development and progress prior to the release of contagion.

I do not like the idea of introducing yet another contagion into the human element as it only would serve to justify what we’ve been doing to you for thousands of years.

There is a view which we have regarding the human species that is not right.

No, worse than that.

It is immoral.