Projekt312: I’ve been thinking about this compromise Glycon. But first, I need you to understand why I personally hate the compromise. Personally, I find it demeaning as hell. Having to give out blood on a daily or weekly basis is unappealing to us.

“What if you were to get paid for it? Something on a par with stuffing envelopes or clipping coupons at home?” Can you elaborate on this more, please? It sounds to simple to be true. There has to be more to it is what I’m saying.

I’ve figured that even the Assembly might force us into such a thing if they deemed it as a necessary cause, for the good of all concerned.

Glycon/RD: The purpose of the audit, is to hear what humanity has to say on the matter.

Your point is taken.

Understand that this is not about some armada invading the Earth or of absorbing the human race through births of attrition.

It’s more about the long term profitability of keeping current management in place.

The Consortium’s current business model is all about the depopulation of the human species, and creating a separate branch of human society to run the show more efficiently via deception and misdirection.

It is the opinion of my employers that this business model is antiquated and contains many flaws that will hinder innovation thus slowing the development of the species.

Speaking in real time is something you probably would have developed already had you not been cajoled into making fusion bombs instead.

This is not to say that a humanity aware of its own contributions to the fabric of life beyond their own sphere of influence wouldn’t harm the current power structure.

It’s suggesting that an enlightened humanity could conceivably put aside their petty differences, and create a more inclusive society whose technological and social advances would give a much needed boost to our information-based currency as we could fold your own unique brand of progress into it.

The Calibration Society always takes the high road by default.

So the argument isn’t what you’re thinking.

It’s more about long term investment over short term gain.

Should our relationship to the human experience be exclusively tied to a corporate ledger whose business model is dependent upon deception and intrigue?

Or, should that relationship be modified to be more inclusive so that the species can develop at its own breathtakingly fast pace and participate in other opportunities for wealth creation that will involve the ownership of their own currency and an ability (even an encouragement) to increase the size of their own portfolios by investing in standardized time?

Where does this awareness begin and end?

Is it exclusively the territory of a small percentage of humans in the know?

Or rather, should the cast of characters that make up the bulk of the movers and shakers of the species be enlightened so that they can join as one people and put all their efforts towards moving beyond this imposed confinement…

Part of the purpose of the audit is to bring these questions to the table and to see what responses and reactions they receive.

The other purpose is to remind those behind the scenes that their movements are being monitored by those who hold the reigns to how they perceive the universe around them.

I’m to be the ghost in the machine, so to speak, ever stirring the pot while allowing it to boil up to the brim, much to the consternation of all.

Garbotalk: There is no compromise with those whose ultimate objective is the rewriting of our minds or harvesting those not overwritten. We must do all in our power to open the eyes of our fellow humans before it is too late.