SCIENCE
The "Invisible Turd" of Dark Matter: Exposing the 4% Blind Spot
Reptiliandude argues that human science is currently in a state of mass “bluffing,” using results from the Planck satellite to show that we can only account for 5% of the universe’s mass. He dismisses Dark Matter and Dark Energy as modern equivalents of the “ether,” calling them invisible placeholders for a fundamental misunderstanding of gravity and galactic cohesion. By referencing the Pioneer anomaly and questioning “which universe” humanity is even asking about, RD hints at a multiverse reality where his species continues to discover new fields and dimensions. He suggests that until humanity moves past its Newtonian “neighborhood” math and acknowledges the broader cosmic structure, it will remain trapped behind a 95% blind spot.
SCIENCE
The "Invisible Turd" of Dark Matter: Exposing the 4% Blind Spot
Reptiliandude argues that human science is currently in a state of mass “bluffing,” using results from the Planck satellite to show that we can only account for 5% of the universe’s mass. He dismisses Dark Matter and Dark Energy as modern equivalents of the “ether,” calling them invisible placeholders for a fundamental misunderstanding of gravity and galactic cohesion. By referencing the Pioneer anomaly and questioning “which universe” humanity is even asking about, RD hints at a multiverse reality where his species continues to discover new fields and dimensions. He suggests that until humanity moves past its Newtonian “neighborhood” math and acknowledges the broader cosmic structure, it will remain trapped behind a 95% blind spot.
Image: Model of the Planck satellite at the RAS NAM 2009 (Photo by Mike Peel via Wikimedia Commons)
Source: RD (via GT), "Advice for Space Objectives from Reptiliandude" r/reptiliandude, Reddit, (March 22, 2017) https://www.reddit.com/r/reptiliandude/comments/60wyaf/advice_for_space_objectives_from_reptiliandude/?rdt=57186
Question: When you had said that our current human understanding of the universe is at 4%, does that mean there is already a full 100% scientific understanding of the universe by your or perhaps combination of species? Or did you mean approximately 4% in comparison to what is currently known?
So that being said, what is left among your species in sciences to discover in this universe? Would your species still happen to be discovering anything more, perhaps even beyond this universe?
Reptiliandude: I’m referring to the data based upon your own Planck satellite results.
Using Newtonian principles, you have a pretty decent grasp of your own neighborhood and with the exception of the occasional unexplained deep space satellite drift you can make the numbers match.
But upon examining the Milky Way galaxy, those numbers don’t match at all.
When you draw back even further and examine the available baryonic matter throughout the universe, the discrepancies become even worse.
There isn’t enough mass to account for how it is all holding together.
So, your scientists bluff.
They use vaguely authoritative explanations of dark matter and dark energy when none of them even know what it is that they’re talking about.
It’s like pulling an invisible turd out of ones own arse to explain what’s supplying the missing mass to gravity ratio in the same manner that your ancestors dreamed up ‘ether’ to explain how light travels through the void.
So, looking at the universe and how it stays together, you can account for about 4-5% of the baryonic mass ( protons and neutrons) that holds it all together.
For the rest of it, your scientists bluff… badly.
As for my own species understanding of the universe, I would have to ask you to be more specific…
As in which one?”
soc-pdox:
Looking at RD’s previous comments, we can gather the following theory:
Different solar systems and different galaxies have different measures of forces affecting mass and different acceleration factors, so they have different time structures, which in turn is something necessary to calculate all their ‘future’ calculations. I suppose this is the necessary piece to the puzzle that we may want to examine?
As for how light travels through the void: the singularity was broken up into pieces bound into regions of fields of fractals, which generate frequencies that hyper-accelerate the flow of certain energies. Energy is stimulated by the natural energy flows of certain shapes.
This seems to be the right track. More thoughts on this?
garbotalk: The full energy spectrum travels the universe like currents in an ocean. We know about a few of them, radiation, magnetism, photonic, etc., but more is happening than we are measuring, or even aware of.
You can call it the singularity breaking into fractals, or call it the big bang.
I call it the Spirit of God burst forth and spread across the universe, holding it together, the moment He chose to create. He is everywhere, within us, around us, the essential part of the energy spectrum, binding us together.
THAT is what our scientists are missing. I think Star Wars had it closer than our scientists do by acknowledging “the force”.
