THE BEACON
The Assembly's Address
Brotato_Potatonator’s theory of a “hydrogen internet” is validated by Reptiliandude’s disclosures regarding the “dance” of sibling atoms. RD confirms that atoms born from the same stellar events remain connected via co-particles (entanglement), allowing for a form of non-local communication that bypasses the speed of light. By manipulating the spin characteristics of the hydrogen nucleus—a process that requires the high-energy environment of plasma fusion—humanity can “poke” the universal network and transmit the Fibonacci sequence. This act would break the “bulwark” of the nucleus and allow us to “speak in real time” to the Assembly, effectively bypassing the Kayeen’s radio-jamming and “golf course” sabotages.
THE BEACON
The Assembly's Address
Brotato_Potatonator’s theory of a “hydrogen internet” is validated by Reptiliandude’s disclosures regarding the “dance” of sibling atoms. RD confirms that atoms born from the same stellar events remain connected via co-particles (entanglement), allowing for a form of non-local communication that bypasses the speed of light. By manipulating the spin characteristics of the hydrogen nucleus—a process that requires the high-energy environment of plasma fusion—humanity can “poke” the universal network and transmit the Fibonacci sequence. This act would break the “bulwark” of the nucleus and allow us to “speak in real time” to the Assembly, effectively bypassing the Kayeen’s radio-jamming and “golf course” sabotages.
Image: Mailbox (Photo by Mikaela Wiedenhoff via Unsplash)
Source: RD, "The Wow Signal"r/reptiliandude, Reddit, (1 June 2017) https://www.reddit.com/r/reptiliandude/comments/6fvc51/the_wow_signal/
Brotato_Potatonator: I wonder if there’s any quantum numbers of hydrogen that have yet to be discovered that would help us out with the beacon. I also wonder if communicating with hydrogen is a little like the internet. From what I know, when a computer sends out a packet of information on a network, all of the computers on the networks see the message. The way a computer knows if the message is intended for that computer is by reading the IP address in the message and then comparing it to its own address. If the addresses match, the computer deciphers the rest of the message and so on…
So here are some questions:
Can hydrogen atoms be configured to have their own addresses, or are they responding to all other hydrogen atoms in the universe at once?
Can the quantum numbers of hydrogen be manipulated to act as an address? Maybe the relative spins of the protons and electrons of the atom are a way of choosing what “network” they communicate on.
Lastly, does reading information from the hydrogen atom destroy or affect the ability of the hydrogen atom to communicate with its brothers? Wouldn’t it be cool if we had a device for “poking” hydrogen in various ways, and a different device that could monitor some hydrogen? Then, we could “poke” the hydrogen atom #1 and then monitor hydrogen atom #2 to see if there is any correlation between their behaviors.
I don’t expect anyone to have definitive answers. I’m just rambling here to get some ideas out there.
Grabotalk: I know directionality is vital. We must aim our signal toward the area of space from whence the signal originated. I think of it like two tin cans with a string between them, only the string we will create will be a hydrogen string.
Brotato_Potatonator: Yeah, I forgot about that part. Though didn’t Glycon mention that all hydrogen born of the same star “dances” with its siblings? I guess I’m challenging the notion of physically aiming a signal vs feeding information into the “dance” and then using it like a computer network. Maybe the “bumping” of the hydrogen needs a direction so that the hydrogen on the other side “bumps” back? That might make some sense in the context of “aiming” a signal.
